M J Heywood & Co
Chartered Accountant
 

Address:
Suite 407
1 Princess St.
Kew, Vic. 3101

Phone:
613 9853 1234

Fax:
613 9853 1023

Email us

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

 Latest Accounting News Service
Hot Issues
Small businesses may ‘collapse under strain of payday super’, IPA warns
ATO’s hands tied with scrapping on-hold debts, expert says
What Drives Your Business Growth and Profits?
Australian Taxation Office (ATO) shifting to firmer debt collection activity
Why employee v contractor comes down to fine print
Sharing economy reporting regime for platform operators
Countries producing the most solar power by gigawatt hours
Illegal access nets $637 million
Accessing superannuation benefits.
Does your business have a company Power of Attorney?
Labor tweaks stage 3 tax cuts to make room for ‘middle Australia’
GrantConnect
2 in 3 SMEs benefit from instant asset write-off, survey reveals
Updated guidance on R&D claims
Do you know how to recover debts?
Wheat Production by Country
Types of small business benchmarks
What is a Commercial Lease?
ATO warns advisers against suspect R&D tax claims
The year of workplace law upheaval
How to Resolve Invoice Payment Disputes
Raft of revenue tweaks in MYEFO to raise millions
The Countries that Export the Most Wine in the World
Record low invoice values ‘reveal inflation sting’
A 2023 Advent Calendar for our clients
Average refund plummets by $580, total payout down $5.4bn
FBT – Christmas Parties and Taxi Fare/Rideshare
Articles archive
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
Quarter 3 July - September 2022
Quarter 2 April - June 2022
Quarter 1 January - March 2022
Quarter 4 October - December 2021
Quarter 3 July - September 2021
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 2 April - June 2005
Small businesses may ‘collapse under strain of payday super’, IPA warns

Existing issues within the SG system must be rectified before the government proceeds with the new changes, the IPA says.



.


The Institute of Public Accountants has told the government that the implementation of payday super should not proceed without system improvements being made first.


In its pre-budget submission, the IPA said the introduction of payday super is a significant departure from the existing arrangements where the payment of employees’ salaries and wages is separate from the payment of their super entitlements.


“Over 60 per cent of employers pay their SG contributions quarterly, so payday super will inevitably be one of the most significant changes to the superannuation sector since compulsory super began,” the IPA said.


 

The association said the existing SG system has many issues that need to be addressed so that they are not dragged into the new regime.


“PDS should not proceed without system improvements addressing the current identified drawbacks, otherwise we will be introducing additional unnecessary complexity into the new regime,” it stated.


 

“The use of SuperStream, clearing houses, super choice/stapling and remittance processes need to be refined and streamlined to support the move to near real time payment of SG.”


The submission noted that the proposed policy changes will impact a wide range of legislative provisions, employers’ compliance requirements, the onboarding of employees with an employer, payment and reporting systems and processes, and services provided by intermediaries such as payroll providers and clearing houses and administration by the ATO.


“As a result, every aspect of the policy and its impact needs to be carefully considered,” the IPA said.


“Otherwise, there is a high likelihood of significant and unintended consequences that may affect employers’ ability to comply with the PDS model.”


The IPA said processes within the current system must be improved as there is only a small window for error corrections to accommodate the more frequent payment of SG.


Cash flow challenges for smaller businesses


The association also warned that more frequent SG contributions will lead to higher costs for employers by way of processing costs and higher transaction and servicing costs.


“In addition, the cashflow consequences for employers cannot be ignored especially for small and medium businesses,” it said.


“The move to immediate payment may pose challenges during the transitional period where the old and new regimes overlap, and some entities, in particular smaller employers, may collapse under this strain, as the proverbial ‘straw that broke the camel’s back’ syndrome.”


Penalty regime for SG must be overhauled


The IPA is also calling on the government to change the current penalty regime for the late payment and underpayment of SG.


“We consider that the Superannuation Guarantee Charge (SGC) model in its current form is overly complex and punitive,” the IPA said.


“The design of the SGC and the associated penalties deter self-rectification, and they therefore operate as a disincentive for employers to voluntarily report and rectify historical shortfalls,” it said.


One of the key concerns, the IPA said, is the draconian application of penalties that do not proportionately reflect the loss to employees or the ‘culpability’ of an employer who is in arrears.


“Late payment penalties under the existing penalty regime for failure to make SG payments on time need to be revised,” the submission said.


“PDS represents an overdue opportunity to completely redesign the SG penalty regime, to make it simplified and less punitive for employers trying to do the right thing. It must deter bad behaviour, whilst encouraging employers to quickly identify and fix errors.”


 


 


 


 


07 February 2024
Miranda Brownlee
accountingtimes.com.au




28th-March-2024